The rise of the individual.
If you find WORDS helpful, Bitcoin donations are unnecessary but appreciated. Our goal is to spread and preserve Bitcoin writings for future generations. Read more. | Make a Donation |
The rise of the individual
By Aleksander Svetski
Posted December 31, 2019
The Fall of the State
âThe greatest danger to the state is independent, intellectual criticismâ
- Murray Rothbard
Dedicated to those who stood up to Tyranny. Today the people of HongKong, tomorrow, all of us.
Why does Bitcoin matter?
I wrote an article on Hacker Noon about a year ago now, which is entitled âWhy Bitcoin Mattersâ.
I explored Bitcoin from first principles, starting with an examination of the societal stack, moneyâs role in society, how it evolved over time, itâs fundamental attributes & functions, and finally culminating into an analysis of why Bitcoin is superior both as a monetary unit & a monetary network (aka; a monetary operating system).
For this piece, Iâd like to take a more, perhaps, ârevolutionaryâ approach to why Bitcoin matters.
Winston Smithâs sub-conscious cry
Itâs that âthingâ which the protagonist (Winston Smith) of Orwellâs seminal piece, 1984, was unknowingly calling out for, and inherently describing, whilst OâBrien was torturing him.
The âforceâ of good that exists in all humans, and the desire for Freedom was and always will be there, but a tool via which it could manifest in spite of the oppressive power of an authoritarian state, just did not, and could not exist at the time.
But itâs no longer 1984. Times have changed.
Bitcoin matters, because Bitcoin is that tool. Itâs what we, the revolutionaries have been missing this entire time.
We had the human spirit, we had the will, we knew there was something wrong, but we lacked the tool with which to stand up to Big Brother.
Bitcoin is that tool.
Whilst getting rich because youâre in the game early is cool and all (greed drives me as much as it does the next person), itâs this revolutionary aspect of Bitcoin that should get you most excited about itâs prospects.
Not since the gunpowder revolution were ordinary men & women able to stand up to those who chose to oppress or rule them unjustly. Only this time, it can be done in a non-violent method, whereby one can peacefully opt out â as John Galt and the âmen of the mindâ did in Atlas Shrugged.
This, above all else, is why Bitcoin matters, and why the legend of Satoshi will go down in history as the most profound story since the beginning of time (or whichever significant religious event / story youâd like to reference instead).
This fact also just reinforces why megalomaniacs like Craig Wright, and his band of deranged cool-aid drinking followers are simply the antithesis to Satoshi and Bitcoin.
Revolutionaries & Renegades
Bitcoin is the stand we take, this decade, this century, this millennium. Bitcoin is the tool we use to separate money & state. Bitcoin is the lightning rod that will bring together the renegades & the revolutionaries.
Bitcoin is of and for the liberators, the missionaries & the visionaries.
The men & women who wonât accept suppression, oppression, or the dictates of a world in which weâre subjugated to the whims of central planners, bureaucrats, rent seekers, attention whores, corrupt politicians, crooked bankers, backdoor dealers, creeping socialism and crony capitalism.
There has never been a tool so incorruptible yet so inherently powerful & accessible.
With it we can reimagine the âstateâ. We will transform society.
We will redefine the very essence of what it means to be a modern, collaborative human.
Have I gone off the deep end? Of course.
But thereâs an entirely new world over here â and at some point, I know youâll join me.
May this essay be a startâŠ.
The separation of Money & State
Make no mistake about it, this century will be defined by the separation of money & state.
It has already started, and nothing can stop it.
Itâs inevitable, assuming of course, we plan on surviving. The alternative is a parasitic dystopian future in which society feeds on itself until it collapses.
SoâŠif we err on the side of humanityâs continuation, we must be honest with ourselves and realise a paradigm shift is nigh.
Even Ray Dalio is coming around. Heâs just missing the word Bitcoin from his most recent articles â although I would guess thatâs a wise move in his shoes, for if he mentions it in a positive light, it may cause a stampede and drive the god damn price up to $1m a coin prematurely and fuck up the S2F model!
Furthermore, it will mean my shitty fiat will buy less Bitcoin â and we canât have that (yet).
So Ray, if youâre reading this, keep buying Bitcoin privately. Please.
_âŠ._Back to separating money & state.
The Paradigm is shifting. Economically, politically, technologically, socially, ethically and in every other way imaginable.
Davidson & Rees-Mogg, in their seminal pre-2000 work, âThe Sovereign Individualâ, posited that this shift started in the 90s, with the fall of the Berlin Wall, the end of communism, and the beginning of the information age.
I would tend to agree with them.
Communism was the peak of the parasitic, centralised state, at least measured in terms of brute violence & broad incompetence.
The crony-capitalism & quasi socialism we in the West live with today are very much improvements on the communism of the USSR, and to some degree so is the Communism in China (thanks to the benefits of capitalism that helped enrich their rulers), but the inherent concentration of the unit through which society is measured (ie; money) has led us to a point of diminishing returns, where peak stupidity, peak stimulus, and peak economic distortion mean the government, aka; âthe stateâ can no longer squeeze more out of the system and has begun to feed on itself.
Note that I omitted peak âoutrightâ violence â but I guess that depends on who you ask. The people of Hong Kong, or the Falun Gong would probably disagree with me.
This shift in âfeeding on itselfâ is evident in the comments made by megalomaniacs such as Bernie Sanders or AOC, for example:
âThe billionaire class is scared, and they should beâ. Bernie Sanders
Comments as such can only come from parasites who have never produced anything, and can only subsist via the expropriation of the production of another.
This is only possible in a system where the instrument through which we measure economic value is the sole privilege of the state.
But this is now changing.
The separation of money & state is being driven by the individual who now has the technological capacity AND the monetary ability to become more autonomous, independent, sustainable and yes, more sovereign, than they have ever before been.
The period will mark the rise of the sovereign individual
Whilst the peak of the state may have come 20yrs ago, the shift is on-going.
It will not happen overnight.
Prior shifts have taken multiple generations, if not multiple centuries to occur, and although today, progress much faster, we still have a ways to go.
And itâs not going to a smooth ride.
Paradigm shifts happen in a tumultuous fashion. They are by definition both constructive AND destructive, simultaneously! Change, in the real world, is a complex process.
Whilst new structures are being built, old structures are coming down, and it will not be smooth. It will not be orderly. It will not be âfairâ, and it will not be âequalâ, thatâs for damn sure.
Your bullshit Keynesian / neo-classical economic & social theories cannot forecast shit, and can do less to make for a âsmooth landingâ or âelegant deleveragingâ (sorry Ray, not likely).
Those who will be most rewarded will, as always, include the lucky (the world abounds with fools of Randomness, eg; Roger Ver), along with the prepared, curious and those hungry for knowledge.
Itâs those who get off their asses and dig deeper than the surface who will be best positioned to be on the constructive side of this shift, whilst the lazy, incompetent, ignorant, arrogant and of course, unlucky, will likely find themselves on the destructive.
âSomething is Rotten in the state of Denmarkâ
The Romans experienced it. So did the Church. Shakespeare wrote a play about it, almost 500 years ago.
There comes a point when the âstateâ, or the âempireâ, or the âcollectiveâ simply starts to rot.
When corruption, rent seeking, politics and all form of non-organic bureaucratic meddling begin to define the function of the very structure that was initially designed for its constituentsâ prosperity, you know the end is nigh.
In modern times, the beacon of prosperity has been capitalism.
In fact, ruthless, free-market capitalism is the mechanism of human collaboration that most closely resembles nature.
Power laws, recursive network effects, complex inputs & outputs that are allowed to reach equilibrium of their own accord, rewards & punishment through inherently system-based incentives and of course; luck.
One can draw parallels to these attributes in all natural systems that have evolved over thousands, millions & billions of years.
So what went wrong with capitalism? How the hell did we wind up with a crony version of capitalism that has rot to the core?
Iâll explain below, but it can be summed up in the following quote by Michael Hopf.
âHard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.â Michael Hopf
Over time, we humans seem to repeatedly stray from founding principles. Our forebears, growing up in better times, forget why some decisions were initially made.
Itâs worse when those forebears realise they can also run a monopoly over the core resource of the time.
The Church had a monopoly on the written word & education (information). Capitalism & Science broke that.
The State today, has a monopoly on Money. Bitcoin is breaking that.
SoâŠ.why the rot?
Productive or Parasitic
In life, likely on planet Earth & anywhere else there may be life, there are two ways to earn a âlivingâ.
- Production. To produce, one must trade their time & energy, in the form of effort, talent, skill and labour, and be rewarded with property, either in the form of currency (money) or in the form of another instrument you deem valuable & commensurate to your work.
- Theft. To steal, you make someone elseâs property your own, without their permission. You take what you want, whether through lying, cheating or most often (as evidenced throughout history), the act of violence.
German sociologist, Franz Oppenheimer calls (1) the âeconomic meansâ by which we build wealth.
Economic because there is an additive & multiplicative effect that occurs as a result of the collaborative efforts of the constituents of a society who produce, and then trade their property, and thus both prosper.
Oppenheimer call the other, mutually exclusive method, the âpolitical meansâ. Political because it is not concerned with the production of new goods or property, but exists and persists through the seizure, appropriation, taxation and theft of said goods & property in the ânameâ of the collective.
Once again, this fundamentally parasitic nature seems to come to a head every 500yrs if you accept the analysis of Davidson & Rees-Moggâs work in âThe sovereign individualâ.
So where are we now?
Understanding which system is dominant in the paradigm within which weâre currently operating is important + useful.
The cycle of humanity
Modern Times
I recently had a conversation with a friend, who I would consider centrist, or moderately conservative in nature (if those labels even mean anything anymore).
She pointed out that centrally managed states such as the Scandinavian countries are the âhappiestâ in the world today, based on the latest statistics & surveys.
Now â whilst those surveys are laughable at best, letâs just assume that there is a grain of truth in there â the problem with this âfactâ is that the âhappinessâ is being measured during the largest monetary inflation in the history of humanity.
Itâs a facade!
And those who are high on this fake happiness are going to feel it the worst as their world crumbles thanks to the bloated social structures that cannot subsist in a new economic reality that is fast approaching.
Furthermore, these âhappyâ people sacrifice their liberty & personal Sovereignty for the illusion of peace via the benevolence of their leaders â who would very quickly justify behaving more like dictators should dire economic circumstances warrant such actions.
And donât for a minute think âit will never happenâ, because it is happening, NOW.
My decree thou shalt yield to, for thy savings are mineâŠ
Former IMF Managing Director, and now head of the ECB, Christine Lagarde recently came out with the following gem:
âIsnât it true that ultimately we have done the right thing to act in favour of jobs and of growth rather than the protection of savers?â
Implying that people should be grateful for their jobs, whether their savings protected or not.
Translation:
âyou should be grateful, for your master gives you the right to be a slaveâ
Are you kidding me?
The very notion of paying an institution just to store your money (well, not really âyourâ money), or being paid to borrow money is utterly absurd â but is slowly being pushed upon us in the west as not only necessary to âstimulateâ the heroin-junkie of an economy we now have, but itâs being called ânormalâ.
Even Dalio is waking up:
âAs a result rich capitalists will increasingly move to places in which the wealth gaps and conflicts are less severe and government officials in those losing these big tax payers will increasingly try to find ways to trap them.â
Ray Dalio
And itâs not just economic madness.
Bernie Sanders, whom I mentioned earlier, is a brilliant example of an old fool espousing a nice-sounding veneer of an ideology with incredibly dangerous roots.
Maybe he was inspiredâŠ..
âIt is difficult for me to imagine what âpersonal libertyâ is enjoyed by an unemployed person, who goes about hungry, and cannot find employment.
Real liberty can exist only where exploitation has been abolished, where there is no oppression of some by others, where there is no unemployment and poverty, where a man is not haunted by the fear of being tomorrow deprived of work, of home and of bread. Only in such a society is real, and not paper, personal and every other liberty possible.â
Sounds nice right?
That same person went on to say:
âWhen we hang the capitalists, they will sell us the rope we useâ
Yep. That same person went on to rule the regime that gave us gulags, famine, deportations, massacres, forced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, torture and and was responsible for not only the deaths of millions of people, but the utter oppression of tens of millions more over the ensuing decades.
That person was Joseph Stalin. (although you may for a moment have thought it was Bernie)
Stalin was, in the early days, viewed as the man who would help the lower class & poor people fight back against the so-called âoppressive capitalistsâ.
Little did those poor people (pun very much intended) realise they would be accepting a modern form of serfdom. Little did they know how dire the ramifications of such an ideology would be.
And here we are, barely a generation since the god damn Berlin Wall came down, at it again.
This time, from the likes of Bernie Sanders, AOC and Elizabeth Warren â all who want to walk in the shoes of Chairman Mao, Lenin or Stalin himself.
This tweet came out just as I was finishing up this piece, and I had to include it:
Of course. Bernie would surely know how to deploy that capitalâŠto his cronies, to the military, to bullshit social programs that donât work and in every other non-functional, mal-invested, mis-appropriated fashion. Bernieâs next book: How to burn $100bn and achieve nothing.
Bernie Sanders is merely the modern day equivalent of prior socialist leaders, who embodies the political means of wealth [confiscation] via the power to rob whomever he deems as unworthy.
Welcome to the slippery slope that leads to communism & enslavement.
The only way to maintain such a system is via violence or the threat of said violence.
Thatâs not freedom. Thatâs slavery.
And no man, woman or child should have to live in a world like that.
This the path of collectivism
One of my favourite lines from Ayn Randâs Atlas Shrugged surmises Hamletâs quote (the headline of this section) perfectly:
Money is the barometer of a societies virtue. When you see that in order to produce you must seek permission from those who produce nothing. When you see money is flowing to those who deal not in goods, but in favours, When you see that men get richer by graft & by pull, not by work, When your laws protect the looters more than the consumer, You will know, that your society is doomed.
- Ayn Rand
Piercing the Veil
Bitcoinâs promise to help bank the unbanked was not to do so by giving them a payments technology. It was to do so by giving them a money via which they have property rights.
Those who live in nations that donât respect, recognise or value personal property are those who have the most freedom to gain.
Those of us in the west, who are watching the state ever so slyly repeal our property rights have a two-fold motivation to participate in this revolution.
(a) We are able to escape the grip of a modern, technologically empowered iron fist which continues to squeeze, and
(b) We ride a rocket ship to the proverbial âmoonâ because we had the balls, foresight, insight, vision or dumb luck to get in early.
Itâs (a) that Iâm personally more interested in though, perhaps due to my personal libertarian bent, or because itâs something I derive a greater sense of âmeaningâ from (likely both).
Now, you might say that:
âHey, youâre exaggerating. Weâre pretty good here in the West. We have stable social structures, good property rights, and yeah while taxes might be high, that money goes to use. We live a pretty good lifeâ.
By & large I would agree. But I would urge you to look beyond the veil.
The central banking cartel & crony capitalist governments of the west have reached a point in history where they can no longer sustain their structure without squeezing their subjects harder. And they know it.
The signs are evident, as described above. Furthermore, look around!
These same âstableâ governments continue to strip away our freedoms via absurdities such as the Anti-Encryption laws in Australia, anti-cash laws, draconian follow-you-everywhere tax laws, inability to travel freely, panopticon surveillance, increased âlaw enforcementâ powers, speeding ticket optimisation frameworks (you canât drive around for 10min in Sydney without seeing a cop hiding around the corner ready to book you for blinking) and even new laws empowering their âagentsâ to force you divulge your private information (eg; decrypting your drives coming into NZ).
Itâs madness.
Ayn Rand was so poignant, once again:
Laws are designed to be broken, not observed. When youâre after power, Thereâs no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. And when there isnât enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law abiding citizens? Thereâs nothing in that for anyone. But pass the kind of laws that cannot be observed, followed or objectively interpreted and you create a nation of criminals & law breakers. Then you cash in on guilt. Thatâs the system.
Cogitos Ergo Sum
I think, therefore I am.
- Descartes
Descartes said this almost 500yrs ago, during the last major transformation in human history; the fall of the dominance of the church & the rise of the merchant-and-science-enabled state.
Much has been said about this recently, particularly in the Bitcoin circles.
Iâm sure all the âcraptoâ people are going to try hijack this soon too, but let it be known here that Bitcoin has been about this from the beginning.
The parallels drawn between the events of the gunpowder revolution, the renaissance, early banking, the rise of the merchant and the fall of the prominence of the church to todayâs technological revolution, private, self-sovereign banking, the rise of the sovereign individual and the fall of the state are eerie.
I think, therefore I am.
Descartesâ words have never been so profound.
The words âI thinkâ and âI amâ are the genesis of the self.
Yes we are all made of the same stuff, but itâs that unique combination of stuff that makes us who we are.
The sanctity of the individual is paramount. Tony Robbins has a profound quote:
âthe most powerful force in the human spirit is the desire to stay consistent with its identityâ.
To say âI amâ is a claim to oneâs identity & independence.
Itâs a claim to oneâs personal sovereignty â which we can now do so like never before, thanks in large part to Bitcoin.
How you may ask?
Our work is our labour. Our labour is our time & and our energy.
When we boil it down, they are all we we have, and all we are truly made up of.
To live, to love, to work, to travel, to experience, to remember, to plan, to do anything requires two things:Â Time & Energy.
We can only effectively measure these through a unit that we can all agree best represents time & energy.
As youâll learn in this publication, âmoneyâ is that unit, and for the first time in history we have a version that can do the job, without being compromised.
It is why Bitcoin is the ultimate tool for personal sovereignty, and the catalyst that leads us to a future more like Star Trek, and less like Terminator.
Incorruptible Property Rights
Bitcoin provides a stable system of property rights without reliance on the State
With it, individuals can be truly self sovereign
The mathematical primitive of strong, open source, modern day cryptography gives us for the first time in history, a method whereby the sanctity of personal property and the act of sacrificing for the future can be maintained WITHOUT the requirement for the protection (or oppression) of the state, the church, the monarch, the feudal lord nor the tribal leader.
In modern times, and in the future that lay before us, Human beings (and potentially machines alike) will be able to save the product of their labour and delay gratification (the very building blocks of society) on their own terms.
As this multiplies, and we are collectively empowered to take back our personal sovereignty (via what is likely the greatest gift to humanity since we became conscious), we have the rare opportunity to define a new form of local & global cooperation that is voluntarist, and non-violent in nature.
Bitcoinâs core âopt inâ or âopt outâ nature, its open access & its absolute nonchalance / disregard of who or what you are is the basis of this new era we now embark on.
Bitcoin has chosen to not only forego the requirement of the state, but has chosen to do this via the irrefutable conversion of time & energy into a visible, verifiable network and unit.
Through Math, it will help us reinvent the notion of what we humans define as âstateâ.
Cash is the ultimate tool of the sovereign individual.
And in an increasingly digital world, the apogee is a peer to peer electronic cash.
Cash is the ability to transact freely. And by freely I mean âto do so in a manner uncensored, direct & finalâ.
That was traditionally only able to be done physically in the real world. Now itâs able to be done digitally.
Ineptitude on display in the crypto community, for example Roger Ver and his BCash cronies, think free means no cost. Theyâre unable to understand that costlessness can only mean one of two things:
- It has no value. ie; the very definition of costlessness is something with no value.
- It has value, in which case cheap & free means there is a cost elsewhere. A cost that is most likely draconian in nature.
They think trending toward a centralised payment system for free internet transactions is what was meant by cash. Thatâs not the freedom cash gives.
Roger clearly got lucky buying bitcoin. Dumb luck, for the ultimate fool of randomness.
Bitcoin, and banking the unbanked was never about cheap payments.
It was about giving everyone an incorruptible, uncensorable tool for economic prosperity.
Bitcoin was, is and always will be a tool for personal sovereignty.
Thatâs what was meant by âcashâ â which of course Satoshi could not be so blatant & brazen about it back in 2008, lest Bitcoin be left in the dustbin of history alongside other crazy ideas.
He let the protocol and its inherent nature do the talking.
He then chose to walk away, and in doing so let loose something no amount of violence can destroy and no amount of tyranny can control.
The rest is historyâŠ.and itâs in the making.
Conclusion
We live in a world where our rights are slowly being encroached upon, our privacy is slowly being repealed, and our freedom to truthfully express ourselves is being censored, whether due to deranged âpolitical correctnessâ on one side or maniacal authoritarian rule on the other (eg; China).
May the brave people of Hong Kong continue to inspire us
Bernie, and those of his ilk, whether due to incompetence, stupidity, or just being a part of what Taleb calls the âintelligentsiaâ, believe in treating the symptoms by introducing more interventionist inputs into an already complex system thatâs slowly spinning out of control.
This will never work, and will only serve to send society to a real-world hell.
The ONLY way to fix up the fuckery of the current system is to start again. We must embrace the essence of Kali, cut out the cancer & burn it all down.
The time for negotiations has come to an end.
Libertarians have tried this to no avail, for playing within the confines of the old paradigm is no way to bring about a new one.
The battle for the future is now, and the front lines are where Bitcoin meets the fiat denominated state.
This is a war, and the stakes are higher than theyâve ever been.
Money is the lifeblood of society. It is wealth, at the very core of what the word means. He who controls it, controls all of society.
The introduction of free markets was the catalyst for the separation of church & state. The creation of free money is the catalyst for the separation of money & state.
And more than that, itâs also a stake in the heart of todayâs state, which has decayed to the point that itâs primary function is to leech, take, suck dry and confiscate your wealth.
Today, it exists no longer to protect you & serve you, but to subdue you. You are once again itâs subject.
You can see this just by looking at the language used for a group who are supposed to be protecting you: âLaw Enforcersâ.
When did I agree to pay someone to âenforceâ laws upon me which I neither agreed to in the first place?
The stateâs control of money is its locus of power. Through this tool, it is able to enforce its will over every facet of our lives.
We, the Bitcoiners of last resort, on the front line, are here to destroy that.
Freedom is not Free
Bitcoin is our chance.
It allows us to take the most important tool of human collaboration, ie; money, aka; the ultimate resource, and make it:
- Un-inflatable
- Un-censorable
- Un-confiscatable
and all in all, un-fuck-with-able.
By removing it from the purview of the state, we:
- Starve the state of its ability to perpetuate itâs parasitic existence
- Get a chance to design a new form of collective collaboration in which personal sovereignty comes first, where the constituents of a society are treated like customers and the âstateâ or âsocial collectiveâ is organised by means of POLA (principle of least authority).
I saw this excerpt a few weeks ago. Pretty sure itâs attributed to Nick Szabo
The cornerstone of all of this is personal sovereignty & liberty, and this is only possible with Bitcoin.
Itâs only possible when the economic unit has personal, private property rights built into its very being.
To paraphrase Winston from 1984 once again, the only thing Big Brother didnât have control over was what goes on in your head & your heart.
Bitcoin transforms money into a unit that is fundamentally information, and information is both nowhere & everywhere.
Itâs both inside of us, and all around us â and when we ourselves know the combination that gives us personal access to that information (money), itâs ours, in the deepest sense of âprivate propertyâ.
Libertarians, Austrian economists and the natural economists before them had it right â only it was never practical in a world in which the unit of economic measurement could be owned or managed by an organisation, government, collective or state of any kind.
butâŠ.
Money has now become an unforgeable form of data, that nobody can control or manipulate â built on a network which nobody needs permission to build products & services on. This foundation allows us to build an entirely new world â not just a financial one, but a new form of society.
SoâŠlet us come togetherâŠ
Bitcoin is now here.
Money is THE battlefront. This is where the battle lines are drawn. Not fucking âblockchainâ. Money. Itâs THE resource. And weâre all going to have to pick a side.
Join us, & weâll show you how deep this rabbit hole goesâŠ.
Bitcoin is now here.
This is the new counter culture. This is what it means to be yourself. To be who you are. To do what you were born for.
To be truly sovereign. Itâs scary â but itâs liberation, in all its glory.
By Aleks Svetski Oct, 2019
The Bitcoin Times Ed 2 is the collaborative work of 8 writers & 1 designer with the intent to educate, inspire and spread ideas on bitcoin.
Each section will be released on Medium as a free long form article, and the full, compiled version of the Bitcoin Times will be available for free at the link below. In 2020, weâll release a limited edition hard cover collectible, for purchase, which youâll be notified of by email if you download the free pdf.
If you found value in this or any of the other essays and articles, please support each of the contributors by sharing it out & following their work.
Download the full guide at:
(Soon to be updated to:Â https://bitcointimes.news)